One agonizing hour, one awkward conversation — you’re to explain all of the terrible realities; you’re to offer all of the vicious truths. Sex, addiction and the troubles between are to be examined for the afternoon. You’ll warn your child of everything. You’ll give him the advice you know is essential. And then… you’ll never speak of this again. The attempt will simply be too brutal, leaves you blushing. A parent’s duty was never meant to be so hard, you believe. Communication was never meant to be so embarrassing.
It was also never meant to be a singularity.
The great temptation all parents must face is the ability to stuff a conversation with less than happy topics, offer it and then walk away. This is thought to be the best form of dialogue: one that is quick and efficient. It’s assumed to be ideal (sparing everyone the mortification of secondary attempts).
This is wrong, however.
Communication is not to be limited to one moment, with all answers tossed haphazardly toward a child. It is instead to be stretched across a lifetime — with youths receiving explanations as soon as they can properly understand them. Important issues (such as drugs, alcohol and intimacy) are to be given often: redefined as children age, made relevant to their current interests and sensibilities. What you would provide a five year old is quite different than what you would offer a teen. And parents must understand this to constantly redefine their approaches and keep the content fresh.
You must be constant with your conversations. You must give them often, encouraging your child to ask the necessary questions and provide his own opinions. Trade information (not accusations) over time. While this may at first seem to be encouraging strained relationships, it will instead solidify them: the more you speak, the more comfortable you will be with each other.
Refuse the need for a singular dialogue. Spice each year with words instead.




